|
Return to Advocacy Index
LOBBYING THE CANDIDATES -
ISSUES FOR 501(C)(3) ORGANIZATIONS
In an election year, policy issues get increased attention from
the public and those running for office, creating an important opportunity
for nonprofit advocacy. Organizations that are tax-exempt under
Section 501(c)(3) are prohibited from engaging in any form of partisan
political activity, but this does not prohibit lobbying
as long as you avoid the implication of partisanship in your work.
Election Year Issues For Nonprofit Organizations available
at our web site is a general overview of these issues. This Alert
looks specifically at how these concerns relate to candidate-lobbying
activities.
I. Use the opportunity to meet with the candidates,
both incumbents and non-incumbents. You can explain what your organization
does, and the issues and policy positions you support. Further,
you can ask them to support your positions, both during the campaign
and if elected. You can ask them to pledge or commit
on questions they will face if elected.
Particularly in Maryland, there will be very little time to
introduce your organization to newly elected officials, or to lobby,
between the November election and the start of the General Assembly
in January. Meetings during the campaign may be your only chance
to build relationships and discuss issues before the legislative
session.
These meetings are also a critical opportunity to influence
positions candidates may take during the campaign itself. And if
they do speak out on your issue, it can draw public and possibly
media attention that will help your future advocacy and lobbying
efforts.
If meetings are not practical, you can also communicate by other
means talking with their staffs, sending them background
materials and your position papers, or asking them to respond to
questions on your issues.
II. Avoid practices that the IRS may consider 'partisan'.
If you are going to meet with candidates or their staffs, send your
position papers or other materials to them, or provide information
supporting your views in any other way, treat all candidates (for
the same office) even-handedly. Provide the same materials and briefing
opportunities to each.
Candidates may publicly endorse your positions or announce 'pledges'
on issues, but Section 501(c)(3) exempt organizations are generally
prohibited from distributing candidate statements. Therefore, you
are not allowed to announce results or distribute accounts of your
'candidate lobbying' efforts before the election. (Whether they
agreed or disagreed with your position, committed to support issues
if elected or re-elected, etc.) This prohibition applies even to
member communications - there is no exception!
If a candidate (or their staff or a supporter) requests reports
or other information, you may honor the request as long as: (1)
the materials are already in existence; and (2) you would have provided
the same document or materials on request to any other candidate
or to a member of the general public. If you would normally charge
a fee, you must charge the same fee. If you do provide materials
to a candidate in response to a request, you should probably offer
the same materials to other viable candidates for the same office.
You may not do 'special order' research, prepare summaries or
elaborations of existing materials, or search files for documents
in a way you would not respond to a request from the general public,
to respond to a candidate request. All staff should be aware of
these rules, and contacts with candidates should be carefully controlled
by a nonprofit's managers.
III. Communications with the candidates to seek their support
or opposition to particular legislation or proposals will normally
be lobbying activity reportable to the IRS on your Form 990. Such
contacts with incumbents, by your organization, or by members at
your suggestion, would be considered 'direct' lobbying. Similar
contacts with non-incumbents are probably 'grassroots' lobbying
if you are asking them to take action as a result of the communication.
**Remember - lobbying is permitted within the limits allowed
for 501(c)(3) nonprofits.
IV. Candidate briefings, or other communications to inform
and influence their views on issues within the Maryland Legislature's
jurisdiction will most probably constitute 'lobbying activity' for
state ethics purposes when dealing with incumbent state officials.
As always, there are expenditure and compensation thresholds that
govern whether registration and reporting is required for this activity.
The newly revised limits are discussed on our web site in the "2002
Lobbyist Ethics Legislation" Public Policy Alert.
V. There are other voter involvement and voter education activities
that 501(c)(3) organizations can undertake during an election campaign.
But the only allowable purpose for 501(c)(3) public functions or
publicly distributed materials that relate or refer to the election
(voter guides, candidate debates, Get Out The Vote drives, etc.)
is voter education and participation. Any expression or 'tracking'
of your own policy agenda in connection with these activities is
likely to create what the IRS would view as an appearance of partisanship.
While these activities can be important 501(C)(3) contributions
to the electoral process, they don't lend themselves to advancing
a specific advocacy agenda.
There are numerous sources of additional information on these subjects
available in Maryland Nonprofits' reference libraries, and on the
Internet, including:
Charity Lobbying in the Public Interest has a new website with
special election-related information, at www.clpi.org,
including an "Ask Bob" feature to get technical help from
their staff.
Alliance For Justice has prepared several very helpful booklets
which can be ordered through their web-site at www.afj.org
. They also offer technical assistance with advocacy questions via
email.
You can also contact Henry Bogdan, Public Policy Director at
Maryland Nonprofits for further information or assistance, at 410-727-6367.
The foregoing information is intended for general guidance and
is not intended as legal advice or to replace legal counsel.
Back to top
|